Summary of Results and Recommendations

International evaluations or accreditations in these countries often happens in addition and parallel to the national, mandatory external quality assurance, rather than being recognised as part of it. This leads to an unproductive duplication of efforts and does not contribute to promoting a genuine European dimension to quality assurance.

Higher education institutions consider as main benefits the development of an international profile, a review that best suits their needs, and enhanced recognition of their degrees

In order to enhance cross-border external quality assurance and to promote the European dimension in quality assurance, a number of recommendations have been formulated with a view to the upcoming EHEA Ministerial Communiqué in May 2015 in Yerevan. EHEA ministers and governments are therefore recommended to fully implement their commitments made in the Bucharest Conference and in particular to:

• recognise their higher education institutions' responsibility for their own quality and enable them to choose a non-national EQAR-registered quality assurance agency (in fulfilling their initial or periodic accreditation, evaluation or audit);
• recognise the use of ESG as a common basis for quality assurance in the EHEA and remove additional requirements on top of EQAR registration for quality assurance agencies before being able to operate in their country;
• provide clear and transparent information (in English as well) on the conditions under which foreign EQAR-registered agencies may operate in their country;
• review national regulations that present obstacles to the ESG-compliant external quality assurance framework, thus help their national agency/agencies to be compliant with the ESG by adapting legislation where necessary;
• strengthen EQAR by becoming Governmental Member and participating actively in the organisation's work.

The last two chapters of the report elaborate further on the conclusions and contain additional recommendations, addressed to quality assurance agencies, higher education institutions and EQAR.

Read the Final Project Report [PDF]

Project Description

The results of the project will enable higher education institutions to make an informed choice to work with internationally active quality assurance agencies adapted to their specific mission and profile. Giving institution access to external quality assurance tailored to their education programmes will create better conditions for quality enhancement and increase the attractiveness of their higher education offer in an international environment.

Purpose

Additionally the project looks into how HEIs make use of the existing possibilities to request quality reviews by foreign agencies listed on the Register, as well as the rationale behind it. The strategic objective/aim is to promote, through EQAR, international trust and recognition of registered QAAs, their results and decisions throughout the EHEA.

Rationale and current context

The commitment was further endorsed within the London Ministerial Communiqué (2007) and underlined in the European Commission's Report on Progress in Quality Assurance in Higher Education.

In January 2012, the EQAR General Assembly, including representatives of European governments and stakeholder organisations, further emphasised this aim by agreeing that the promotion of recognition of registered agencies is a strategic priority in EQAR’s work during the years to come and the 2012-2013 EQAR plan of work specifically points out to the need to conduct an analysis of recognition for EQAR registered agencies.

In April 2012, the EHEA ministers underlined in the Bucharest Communiqué that they ‘will allow EQAR-registered agencies to perform their activities across the EHEA, while complying with national requirements’ and that they ‘will aim to recognise quality assurance decisions of EQAR-registered agencies on joint and double degree programmes.’

Enabling HEIs to work with a QAA that best fits their own mission and profile contributes to:

• quality reviews best suited to particular HEIs and their programmes,
• more effective quality improvement by better suited quality assurance,
• facilitating quality assurance and accreditation of joint and double degree programmes,
• further convergence of European quality assurance systems,
• a coherent and flexible external quality assurance system for Europe as a whole, based on the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance (ESG),
• improving internationalisation and mobility prospects for European HEIs.

Recognition of activities of EQAR-registered agencies currently takes various shapes: some countries fully recognise all activities and decisions of foreign EQAR-registered QAAs, while others have a two-step procedure, in which the final decision on issues such as accreditation for example still lies with the national QAA or other bodies. EQAR-registered QAAs can be used for quality assessing joint degree programmes (Denmark) or used for quality ensuring cross-border provision (Poland). According to the 2012 Bologna Process implementation report, fourteen EHEA national systems claim that all HEIs are free to be evaluated by other QAAs other than their own (not necessarily EQAR-registered), while other eight countries suggest that under certain conditions, some agencies are able to pursue this route The analysis aims to provide a better understanding of the current situation.

Research questions

• What are the existing legal provisions in countries recognising EQAR-registered agencies and how countries use EQAR as a reference to recognise foreign QAAs and their evaluation, audit or accreditation results or decisions?
• What is the rationale for countries which do not recognise foreign EQAR-registered agencies to continue to do so? Is there a wish for things to change from the side of national QAAs, HEIs or other stakeholders within these countries?
• How frequently do HEIs make use of the possibility to choose to be evaluated, audited or accredited by an EQAR-registered QAA from another country and what is the rationale for them to (not) do so?
• What are the good practice examples that can be built upon (recognition of joint degrees, Erasmus Mundus etc)?

Work Plan

• Desk research mapping recognition of registered QAAs across the EHEA
• Qualitative analysis on the rational for international activity of (EQAR-registered) quality assurance agencies
• A seminar for quality assurance agency representatives
• Overview of 12 institutional experiences regarding international quality reviews
• Final project report
• Final conference

The gathered information will be continuously updated on the website at: https://eqar.eu/register/national-legislations.html.

Please contact us if you have any questions or other relevant examples that might be missing.